Tag Archives: stephen king

Ten Literary Rumors I’d Like To Start

Posted on by

In honor of my friend Ron Gullekson‘s blog post, “Ten Rumors I’d Like To Start,” let me offer my bookish version: Continue reading

Addendum to Stephen King on Tabitha

Posted on by

My last post was a collection of quotes from Stephen King’s On Writing, all about his wife Tabitha and the critical role she plays in his phenomenal success.

I am not sure how, but one of my favorite anecdotes from the book slipped under my radar when I decided to write a piece on it.

It’s odd, actually, because this was the part of the memoir where I felt the sharp pang of jealousy that made me realize that Tabitha was the key insight I was going to take away from the book.

So, in the interest of being thorough, here’s my final excerpt from On Writing: Continue reading

Stephen King on Tabitha – Selected quotes from “On Writing : A Memoir of the Craft”

Posted on by

I was hesitant to read Stephen King’s On Writing because I was afraid I would find little in it that was unexpected.  Keep sending out queries, ✔ check.  Don’t use this or that part of speech except when it works, ✔ check.  Read a lot, ✔ check.  Write a lot, ✔ check.

But, I did finally relent, and one key theme in the memoir struck me as more insightful than anything I had read about writing for years.  In fact, I think it merits a book of its own.  I am talking about the critical influence of people other than the writer in the success of that writer. For King, the most important other-than-the-writer person is his wife Tabitha.

No matter how important individual determination might be, for a social creature like Homo sapiens there is no such thing as individual success.  All success is cooperative.  There would be no Stephen King (as we know him) if there were no Tabitha King.

So, today I want to share what I feel are the most revealing and inspiring quotes on Tabitha from On Writing. Continue reading

My Top Fiction of 2010

Posted on by

I have a Top Book of 2010.  Yes, a book.  Singular.

I was considering posting a Top Books of 2010 list.  After all, that’s what people do. The New York Times did it, Publishers Weekly did itThe Daily Beast did it, The Huffington Post did it, you get the idea.

And, if all these guys are jumping on the literary soap box, so would I.  And I eventually did (see the bold, red text below) but not in the way I expected.

Continue reading